Yesterday I posted a question about ‘true’-ness.
Is there such a thing as a “true” slave/submissive?
No one left any comments, perhaps we are just not willing to question?
luna says:
I don’t believe there is such a thing. I do think that people confuse the terms true and natural. I do know that there is natural submission and there is behavioral submission. I’m in the later group. I don’t believe that my personality allows for natural submission at all but I want to submit with my whole being and so I do.
I think that true-ness is a spin off of those that believe there is one true way to do what it is that we do and they aren’t accepting of other people’s definitions and methods. It’s rather pig-headed of them, isn’t it? It would be like critiquing someone on the way they peel an apple. There is no one correct way, there are a variety of ways that get you to the same result; a peeled apple. Why can’t sex magic be the same way? Why can’t D/s be the same way?
It can and is. No two relationships are the same, no two people are the same so there can’t be a ‘true’ submissive. True almost always defines as ‘only one’ way. When someone tells me that I’m not a true submissive; I come back with “I am not living a false life. This is my true self and I will live up to my Master’s desires.”
It would be boring to read this blog if I was trying to live up to the ideal way that is defined by fantasy. First, it wouldn’t work. I can not be fantasy. I am real, with my own issues and stop points. This is who I am. But look back a year ago and you will see a very different person. I’m getting better all the time.
Improvement is the point of all trueness. I am true to myself. I know what I want and how to get there. That’s the best trueness to have.